Filters

2019 - 201912020 - 20211
Reset filters

Settings

search.filters.applied.f.dc.language.iso: en × Subject: curriculum ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    PROJECT-BASED CURRICULUM FOR INTERNET OF THINGS ONLINE COURSE
    (СДУ хабаршысы - 2021, 2021) Zh. Mamatnabivev; M. Zhaparov
    Abstract. Nowadays, the applications of the Internet of Things (IoT) are getting popular and the number of internet connecting devices are increasing very fast. Many IoT courses are being taught in educational universities. However, the curriculum of the courses does not answer to the requirements of the industry and market, and students have not enough knowledge if they are getting the course online, where there is no offline lab work. Project based curriculum for online IoT courses is developed and grades of the student projects are compared with the knowledge of the students before project implementation. The comparison results are promising and future works are discussed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    PRESERVICE TEACHERS’ THINKING ABOUT AGENCY AND ASSESSMENT
    (СДУ хабаршысы - 2019, 2019) Jeffrey Spencer Clark; N.Otegen; M.Jandildinov
    Abstract. This case study provides a glimpse into two preservice social studies teachers’ thinking about their own agency as curriculum developers. Albert Bandura’s (2001) framework for personal agency was used as a theoretical lens to better understand the preservice teachers’ thinking about their own intentionality (their purpose for teaching social studies) and forethought (their perceived capabilities and constrains in future school community). The analysis of twenty data items found that both preservice teachers’ developed curriculum that supported their purpose for teaching social studies; however, when they considered the assessments that they had developed a divergence in their thinking emerged. The findings also suggest that the preservice teachers’ differing expectations about acceptance in their future school communities contributed to their divergent thinking about assessment. The preservice teachers’ understood the outcomes of their assessment decisions in two distinct ways, and this shaped how they perceived their own agency in the current educational climate.